Post-65ers

Wow, I’m amazed that my generation actually make up more than 50% of the population. How can the gahman say that society is predominantly conservative? I have a feeling that Singapore is predominantly people who don’t really bother, conservative or otherwise (if the ‘post-65ers’ are anything like me and the people I know), this article also sites this fact too.



Taken from Today 07 April 2006.

UNDERSTANDING A PHANTOM GENERATION
----------------------------------
To post-65ers, a majority group in the electorate, material values and
lofty ideals may not be mutually exclusive News Comment: We set you
thinking

Terence Chong

EVER since Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong called on younger Singaporeans
to step forward to make a difference, the term "post-65ers" has never been
far from the limelight. With the general elections looming, post-65ers -
Singaporeans aged 41 and below - will be under greater scrutiny.

The Government has made concrete moves to engage younger Singaporeans. The
Ministry of Community Development and Sports, for example, was renamed the
Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports in September 2004.
Later that year, it embarked on a youth consultation exercise, called
Youth: Creating Our Future, to discuss ideas and aspirations important to
younger generations, and the conclusions reached will shape the framework
for future programmes.

But why this attention to post-65ers? There are more than 1.64 million of
them, or 55 per cent of the population. More than 60 per cent have at
least secondary-school education while their parents had only
primary-school education. At the age of 30, two in three were already
living in four-room or larger HDB flats, or in private property.

One in two holds executive jobs as managers or professionals, while 44 per
cent have higher-skilled jobs than their parents. Those born after 1965
earned an average of $2,600 a month in 2000, higher than the national
average of $2,200.

Nonetheless, these quantitative characteristics of post-65ers would not
have garnered political attention were it not assumed that they are
accompanied by certain ideas and aspirations. The strong belief that
younger Singaporeans differ from their parents in terms of cultural,
social and political values has been a key factor in the People's Action
Party (PAP) Government's concerted effort to turn the post-65ers into a de
facto constituency.

Not only have ministries been reshaped to address their concerns, but
ministers and party candidates, too, have been handpicked to appeal to
this "constituency". Indeed, the need to reflect the interests of this
constituency feeds the PAP's entrenched principle of self-renewal and
sustained relevance.

The PAP's treatment of post-65ers as a coherent constituency may also have
been influenced by the broader scholarship on the shifting values of
"post-materialist" generations. According to Ronald Inglehart, a
post-materialist, the global equivalent of our post-65er is more
interested in citizenry consultation and the concept of a society based on
lofty ideals, rather than in material-based values such as economic
growth, a strong national defence, and law-and-order issues.

Inglehart's argument is that people value most what they were relatively
deprived of in their youth. Hence, those growing up after World War II are
generally more post-materialist than those growing up before the war, as
they did not experience material deprivation.

Inglehart has his critics, most of whom point out that many developed
societies show no clear sign of a post-materialist culture. Many argue
that material interests and post-material concerns are not mutually
exclusive. There is no contradiction between, say, desiring greater
personal wealth and fighting for improved human rights.

Perhaps this is why it has been so hard to identify and define the
interests of Singapore's post-65 constituency.

Are we concerned with liberal democracy or economic pragmatism? Are we
idealists or realists?

Like the three blind men touching different parts of an elephant, you'll
come up with different descriptions, depending on whom you ask. And it is
not sociologically sound to say that only Singaporeans aged 41 and below
are interested in censorship liberalisation, human rights and the
environment.

Other variables such as education, cultural capital and class have to be
considered - thus making the post-65er constituency a somewhat phantom
one.

Indeed, recent newspaper surveys indicate mixed signals from post-65-ers.

In a survey of Singaporeans aged between 21 and 34, 49 per cent said they
were "somewhat interested" in local politics, while 51 per cent were "not
interested". When asked for the issue "likely to influence their voting
decision", they cited cost of living (89 per cent), jobs/unemployment (73
per cent) and housing policy (68 per cent).

Does it surprise us that materialism ranks high for post-65ers?

Perhaps in defining this de facto constituency, the Government has also
been able to socialise it with a certain outlook and priorities. We are
constantly told to keep an eye on global and regional competition, and to
bear in mind that no one owes us a living. It is no wonder that
materialism continues to be the yardstick of both personal and national
success.

And perhaps it is no coincidence that such a yardstick is also an implicit
legitimisation of the Government, which has been so successful in
delivering economic growth.

Nonetheless, even if we accept that the post-65 constituency is an
amorphous one without any signature issue, one cannot escape the sense
that youth, in all its glory, comes with certain desires.

Speak to young Singaporeans about the country they want, and most will
talk about wanting more space to chase dreams and express their
individuality. These are desires our parents do not talk about.

But are these desires enough to influence voting patterns in the
elections? Probably not. They will most likely be diffused by
long-standing concerns such as the job market, employability and rising
living costs.



The writer is a Fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. This
is a personal comment.